<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Web Design Blog &#187; Branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newshoemedia.com/blog/tag/branding/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newshoemedia.com/blog</link>
	<description>SEO and Search Engine Friendly Web Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Templates Are For Losers</title>
		<link>http://www.newshoemedia.com/blog/branding/templates-are-for-losers</link>
		<comments>http://www.newshoemedia.com/blog/branding/templates-are-for-losers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Claye Stokes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business web sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clayestokes.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why branding is important, even for small business websites.
Last week, comScore issued a press release with an interesting find:
&#8220;The most effective online marketing tool for both patients and prospects is the brand’s Web site.  It’s important to realize, though, that visits to a brand Web site are achieved through the use of a variety of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Why branding is important, even for small business websites.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Last week, comScore issued a <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2343">press release</a> with an interesting find:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The most effective online marketing tool for both patients and prospects is the brand’s Web site.  It’s important to realize, though, that visits to a brand Web site are achieved through the use of a variety of offline and online tactics, such as online banner ads, search and offline advertising. This is why it is essential for marketers to develop fully-integrated campaigns that not only raise awareness and educate consumers but that also drive visitation to a site.&#8221;<br />
<cite>- Bridget O’Toole, comScore Executive Vice President</cite>
</p></blockquote>
<p>comScore researched web sites and internet marketing techniques in the pharmaceutical field and found that previous exposure to a Pharmeceutical brand through online and online advertising increased brand awareness and favorability: those critical ingredients to dominating the competition.</p>
<h3>What does this mean for small businesses?</h3>
<p>That means if you&#8217;re using a weak, un-branded template web site that everyone and their neighbor has seen dozens of times, <strong>you&#8217;re going to lose</strong> to your competition with a more branded web site.</p>
<p>Using cheap (hopefully free &#8211; it&#8217;s just a template!) templates is never cost-effective. There are some nice templates that may be close enough to your brand to pull off, but the number one reason I would never suggest using a template is because using a template gives the impression of being completely finished &#8211; buttoned up.</p>
<p>Just as Ms. O&#8217;Tooele points out, however, your website is your most effective online marketing method, and like all marketing campaigns, it needs to be tweaked, optimized, and fine-tuned to maximize it&#8217;s revenue-building potential.</p>
<p>The second reason why you shouldn&#8217;t go for the cookie-cutter template: you lose your identity. I&#8217;m always disappointed when I come to a template site because I wanted to see that company&#8217;s identity, not a yellowpages column. What makes your company unique? What&#8217;s your USP? Make your site communicate that effectively. The reason is obvious in these two screenshots:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.remboltludtke.com/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-43" style="margin: 10px 20px;" title="branded-lawyer" src="http://www.newshoemedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/branded-lawyer.jpg" alt="Branded Lawyer" width="200" height="151" /></a><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.hslegalfirm.com/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-44" style="margin: 10px 20px;" title="unbranded-lawyer" src="http://www.newshoemedia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/unbranded-lawyer.jpg" alt="Un-branded Lawyer Website" width="200" height="151" /></a></p>
<div class="clear"></div>
<p>I searched for &#8220;attorney lincoln nebraska&#8221; and found these two results near the top: guess which one I would trust with my business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newshoemedia.com/blog/branding/templates-are-for-losers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Branding Isn&#8217;t Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.newshoemedia.com/blog/branding/branding-isnt-dead</link>
		<comments>http://www.newshoemedia.com/blog/branding/branding-isnt-dead#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Claye Stokes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clayestokes.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; it just can&#8217;t survive without SEO.
This is in response to Matt Ellsworth&#8217;s post Branding is Dead; Long Live SEO because his blog comments are either turned off or dysfunctional.
I completely agree with the huge (and rarely understood, at least by business owners) impact good SEO can have on business, but I disagree completely that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; it just can&#8217;t survive without SEO.</p>
<p>This is in response to Matt Ellsworth&#8217;s post <a href="http://www.articlesnatch.com/blog/2008/05/14/branding-is-dead-long-live-seo/" target="_blank">Branding is Dead; Long Live SEO</a> because his blog comments are either turned off or dysfunctional.</p>
<p>I completely agree with the huge (and rarely understood, at least by business owners) impact good SEO can have on business, but I disagree completely that branding is in any way dead, or dying. The fact that <a href="http://searchengineland.com/080416-123001.php" target="_blank">Google recently opened its Website Optimizer to all users</a> proves that <em>branding </em>(a significant part of <em>website optimization</em>), not just <em><acronym title="Search Engine Optimization">SEO</acronym></em>, will continue to play an important role in the future.</p>
<p>A significant part of <strong>website optimization</strong> is reducing the unease that many internet users still feel about giving out their personal information and giving out <acronym title="Credit Card">CC</acronym> numbers; and what can beat the influence of a recognizable brand like Amazon or Walmart when shopping on the web?</p>
<blockquote><p>Today, [finding products] is quite different. Looking to buy a new MP3 player in 2008? With a search engine, that&#8217;s about all you need to know. A search in Google for &#8220;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=mp3+player">mp3 player</a>&#8221; brings up <a rel="nofollow" href="http://reviews.cnet.com/mp3-player-buying-guide/">C|Net&#8217;s MP3 Buying Guide</a>. After reading some reviews, you decide on a <a rel="nofollow" href="http://reviews.cnet.com/best-flash-memory-mp3-players/?tag=txt">flash memory player</a> and then on the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://reviews.cnet.com/mp3-players/creative-zen-16gb/4505-6490_7-32589080.html?tag=txt">Creative Zen 16GB</a>. You might then check out the prices quoted on C|Net, or search for &#8220;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=creative+zen+16gb">Creative Zen 16GB</a>&#8221; in Google, or in a price comparison engine like <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/products">Google Product Search</a> or <a rel="nofollow" href="http://shopping.com/">Shopping.com</a>. And you&#8217;ll likely end up getting the Zen from whichever store has the best price and seems trustworthy.</p>
<p>Branding still matters somewhat. After all, you might recognize the names &#8220;C|Net,&#8221; &#8220;Creative&#8221; and &#8220;Zen.&#8221; But you didn&#8217;t find them based on their brand; you found them via search. In fact, the branding that matters the most were those of the tools you used: Google, Google Product Search and Shopping.com.</p></blockquote>
<p>Matt is forgetting (the coveted) <em>brand recognition</em>. The Creative Zen mp3 player is ideal for shoppers whose top priority is <strong>price</strong>, but nobody (speaking generally here) is thinking about buying a Creative Zen when they start shopping. Shoppers that want to buy a mp3 player, realistically, aren&#8217;t thinking of anything but an Ipod. Whether or not that is what they actually end up buying, Apple has the corner on brand recognition when it comes to mp3 players &#8211; like it or not.</p>
<p><strong>What does that mean for SEO?</strong> More users are just going to search for &#8216;ipod&#8217;<em> </em>than for &#8216;mp3 player&#8217; because the <em>brand</em> is what first comes to mind when a user wants to buy a mp3 player.</p>
<p class="highlight">Proof: compare 14,514 daily searches for <strong>mp3 player</strong> vs 52,518 daily searches for <strong>ipod</strong> <a title="Keyword Tracking Tool" href="http://freekeywords.wordtracker.com/" target="_blank"><small>source</small></a>.</p>
<p>My last point: a good, well-researched brand beats out the competition. We have all resorted to the trusty back button after a Search Engine Results link has sent us to a poorly designed site that a Jr. High Schooler likely put together for free &#8211; and we ended up using another site that looks professional, trustworthy, and as expected.</p>
<p>Brand isn&#8217;t everything (and it isn&#8217;t going anywhere), but neither is SEO. The only way to compete online is to win at both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newshoemedia.com/blog/branding/branding-isnt-dead/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
